State v. Barker
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 2044
Syllabus
In this appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), there are no potential assignments of error having arguable merit. Any challenge to Appellant's sentence is barred by res judicata. Any issue regarding counsel's alleged ineffective assistance during the appellant's trial is barred by res judicata. The record establishes that appellant did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel at his resentencing hearing. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Donovan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court· 1967-05-03· cited 2,571×
- State v. FischerOhio Supreme Court· 2010-12-23· cited 1,066×
- State v. WilsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-01-25· cited 7×
- State v. BarkerOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-07-28· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.