State v. Bach

Citations

• 2019 Ohio 295

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in re-sentencing Appellant, pursuant to this Court's mandate, to correct the imposition of post-release control on his felonious assault offense. Appellant has not yet served his sentence for felonious assault. Appellant's argument regarding the imposition of financial sanctions is barred by the doctrine of res judicata. Appellant was not denied the effective assistance of counsel at his limited re-sentencing hearing. Judgment affirmed.