Ohio Court of Appeals· 7/28/2017

State v. Barker

Citations

2017 Ohio 6994

Syllabus

Trial court did not err in denying motion to correct record, pursuant to Crim.R. 36 and App.R. 9(E). Crim.R. 36 was not appropriate where defendant did not allege clerical errors, and App.R. 9(E) did not apply where no appeal was pending. Even if the motion were construed as a petition for post-conviction relief, the trial court properly overruled the petition as untimely. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Froelich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

State v. McCain
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-09-08· cited 15×
State v. Barker
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-05-25· cited 5×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Gondor
Ohio Supreme Court· 2006-12-26· cited 691×
State v. Steffen
Ohio Supreme Court· 1994-09-28· cited 454×
State v. Frazier
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-02-26· cited 38×
State v. Current
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-05-10· cited 28×
State v. Barker
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-03-28· cited 2×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.