Skip to main content

State v. Barber

Citations

  • 2021 Ohio 1506

Syllabus

Crim.R. 16 – EVIDENCE/WITNESS/TRIAL – JUROR MISCONDUCT – JUDICIAL NOTICE: Although the state's witness nondisclosure certification under Crim.R. 16(D) was not sufficiently case-specific, defendant could not show that he was materially prejudiced. Testimony by a detective that purported to interpret video evidence did not warrant a mistrial because the trial court took immediate steps to blunt potential prejudice. The trial court did not abuse its direction in denying a mistrial for juror misconduct because the court dismissed the offending juror and appropriately investigated the misconduct. The trial court did not commit plain error by taking judicial notice of the date of a Facebook post because the primary value of the evidence was the post itself.

Judges: Bergeron

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.