State v. Snyder
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 4444
Syllabus
HEARSAY — INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL — DUE PROCESS — PREINDICTMENT DELAY — EVIDENCE — SUFFICIENCY — MANIFEST WEIGHT — FELONY MURDER — FELONIOUS ASSAULT — CHILD ENDANGERMENT-R.C. 2919.22(A) — IMPROPER VOUCHING — WITNESS COMPETENCY — PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT: Where parents were charged with murder of a child, felonious assault, and endangering children, a foster parent's testimony recalling two of defendants' children's statements describing the defendants' assaulting the victim more than two months after the victim's death was not admissible under the excited-utterance hearsay exception because the children did not make the statements shortly after reaching \safety\ and made the statements long after they witnessed the event, but the error was harmless because the hearsay statements were cumulative of the children's trial testimony. Although the trial court abused its discretion by admitting unredacted emails between defendant's mother and defendant's sister under the state-of-mind hearsay exception where only portions of the email related to the declarant's then-existing state of mind, that admission was harmless as the email itself did not establish any element of any of the charges and other trial testimony was cumulative of the email. The trial court did not err by allowing a pediatrician specializing in child abuse to offer an opinion as to whether a bruise on the victim's forehead was related to the victim's fatal subdural hematoma because the expert was a pediatrician with 25 years' experience who regularly consulted on suspected child-abuse cases, had reviewed the child's complete medical records, and had consulted with other specialists. The State presented sufficient evidence to sustain defendants' convictions for felony murder and felonious assault where testimony established that defendants jointly struck their son's head against a wall the day their son died, and medical experts established that defendants' son died from a subdural hematoma that o
Judges: Bock
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
81 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2006-06-19· cited 4,179×
- Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 3,512×
- Eastley v. VolkmanOhio Supreme Court· 2012-05-22· cited 2,407×
- State v. ApanovitchOhio Supreme Court· 1987-10-07· cited 870×
- State v. DeMarcoOhio Supreme Court· 1987-07-08· cited 679×
- Johnson v. Abdullah (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2021-09-22· cited 666×
- State v. LangOhio Supreme Court· 2011-08-31· cited 509×
- State v. BostonOhio Supreme Court· 1989-10-25· cited 497×
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1933-11-06· cited 477×
- State v. Adams (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2015-10-01· cited 375×
- In re Z.C.Ohio Supreme Court· 2023-12-27· cited 335×
- State v. TaylorOhio Supreme Court· 1993-05-26· cited 309×
- Hal Artz Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Ohio Supreme Court· 1986-12-19· cited 241×
- State v. GwynneOhio Supreme Court· 2023-10-25· cited 232×
- State v. ArnoldOhio Supreme Court· 2010-06-17· cited 197×
- State v. StowersOhio Supreme Court· 1998-03-18· cited 177×
- State v. WallaceOhio Supreme Court· 1988-06-08· cited 175×
- State v. DuncanOhio Supreme Court· 1978-03-15· cited 165×
- United States v. John D. RogersSixth Circuit· 1997-07-02· cited 157×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.