State v. Bale

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that K.S.A. 22-4513 is a recoupment statute, not a penally statute, and a court may impose fees without pronouncing the fees at the sentencing hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Phillips
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2009-06-19· cited 49×
• State v. McCarley
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2008-11-07· cited 44×
• State v. Payne
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2025-01-31

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• State v. Robinson
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2006-04-28· cited 205×
• State v. Jacques
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2000-12-08· cited 73×
• State v. Hayden
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2006-03-17· cited 73×
• State v. Rupnick
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2005-12-16· cited 67×
• State v. Cooperwood
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2006-12-08· cited 60×
• State v. Gordon
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1976-05-08· cited 57×
• State v. Hawkins
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2008-02-08· cited 50×
• State v. Chastain
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1998-05-29· cited 45×
• State v. Anderson
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2000-10-27· cited 37×
• State v. Branning
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2001-07-13· cited 31×
• State v. Scott
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2007-12-07· cited 31×
• Love v. State
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2005-12-09· cited 22×
• State v. Yowell
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1959-03-07· cited 19×
• State v. Woodman
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1987-04-16· cited 13×
• State v. Collins
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2006-07-28· cited 11×
• State v. Wenzel
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2008-03-07· cited 4×
• In Re Bock
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2008-02-01· cited 2×