Skip to main content

State v. Woodman

Citations

  • 735 P.2d 1102
  • 12 Kan. App. 2d 110
  • 64 A.L.R. 4th 153
  • 1987 Kan. App. LEXIS 927

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing in part for failure to instruct jury on intervening cause in support of defendant’s theory that victim’s running a red light, not defendant’s DUI, caused death
  • reversing conviction for lack of instruction related to defendant’s theory of defense: that victim’s death related to his running a stop light, not due to defendant’s intoxication
  • defendant charged with aggravated vehicular homicide, driving under the influence; victim ran red light; jury instruction too vague on necessity of proximate-cause proof; conviction reversed
  • on the facts of the case, DUI was a lesser included offense of aggravated vehicular homicide because “all of the elements of driving while under the influence of alcohol are required to establish the greater offense of aggravated vehicular homicide”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, P.J., Briscoe and Brazil

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.