Court of Appeals of Maryland· 11/24/1980
State v. Bailey
Citations
- 422 A.2d 1021
- 289 Md. 143
- 1980 Md. LEXIS 243
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that a motion to dismiss an indictment “is not a proper vehicle for testing the admissibility of ... evidence at trial”
- addressing the possibility of differing standards for wiretaps under similar state and federal statutes
- addressing the possibility of differing standards for wiretaps under similar state and federal statutes
- ac-knowledging the Maryland’s Wiretap Act is an “offspring” of Title III
- the right to appeal “in either a civil or criminal case, must find its source in an act of the legislature”
- “The Maryland “Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance’ law is an offspring of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968.... ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coije, Murphy, Smith, Digges, Eldridge, Cole, Davidson, Rodowsky
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Haas v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-01-09· cited 143×
- State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-12-07· cited 94×
- Gisriel v. Ocean City Board of Supervisors of ElectionsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-05-01· cited 91×
- Mustafa v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-06-25· cited 87×
- Derry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-03-17· cited 82×
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-05-02· cited 60×
- Ricks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-03-04· cited 56×
- Fearnow v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1995-01-11· cited 55×
- Prince George's County v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-03-09· cited 38×
- Cardinell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-07-14· cited 37×
- State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-11-12· cited 36×
- Cubbage v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1985-10-09· cited 36×
- State v. PottleOregon Supreme Court· 1984-01-24· cited 32×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-03-08· cited 30×
- Clark v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-09-26· cited 28×
- Pack Shack, Inc. v. Howard CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-10-09· cited 28×
- Bell v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1981-05-12· cited 26×
- Wood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-06-30· cited 20×
- Mateen v. SaarCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-08-04· cited 19×
- State v. HoltonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-07-13· cited 19×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 4,063×
- Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 1,212×
- Clark v. ElzaCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-10-23· cited 103×
- Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. v. Los Angeles Rams Football Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-11-27· cited 93×
- State v. SiegelCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1972-09-01· cited 92×
- Everhart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1975-04-14· cited 90×
- State v. ShieldsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1878-06-27· cited 83×
- Neal v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1974-09-01· cited 72×
- Lohss and Sprenkle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1974-06-27· cited 59×
- Jolley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-04-07· cited 54×
- Matthews v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1965-02-03· cited 44×
- Pearlman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1961-07-05· cited 42×
- Smith v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-05-08· cited 40×
- Estep v. EstepCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-07-13· cited 38×
- Richardson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1969-06-30· cited 17×
- State v. MayesCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-03-29· cited 14×
- Hayward v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-12-06· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.