Estep v. Estep

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he court in banc acts only as an appellate tribunal so that its decisions are not those of a reconsidering trial court but are reviewable as final appellate judgments.” (footnote omitted)
• “general rule [is] that orders granting a new trial are not appealable”
• “It being established that the jurisdiction of the appellate courts of this State ‘is at this time delimited by statute,’ ... we look to the pertinent enactment to determine the scope of the courtfs] ... basic authority to act”
• “It being established that the jurisdiction of the appellate courts of this State 'is at this time delimited by statute,’ ... we look to the pertinent enactment to determine the scope of the court[’s] ... basic authority to act”
• While the Court noted that the Court of Special Appeals could exercise jurisdic tion, the holding in the case was that the in banc court lacked jurisdiction and that the single circuit judge’s decisions were not final and, therefore, not appealable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).