Skip to main content

Davis v. State

Citations

  • 43 A.3d 1044
  • 426 Md. 211
  • 2012 WL 1521650
  • 2012 Md. LEXIS 263

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that definitions of “intercept” in Maryland and Federal Wiretap Acts are “identical[ ].”
  • “We rely on the testimony of the bill sponsor in determining the legislative intent; especially where there were minimal amendments to the bill introduced after that testimony.”
  • “[A] qualifying clause ordinarily is confined to the immediately preceding word or phrase[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harrell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.