State v. Bach
Citations
- 2017 Ohio 7262
Syllabus
Defendant-appellant appeals pro se from an order overruling his motion to correct his sentence. The termination entry incorrectly states that the period of post release control Defendant-appellant must serve upon his release from prison for the offense of Felonious Assault, a second degree felony, is five years, rather than the proper period of three years. This mistake, as the State concedes, constitutes prejudicial error making this portion of the sentence void but subject, upon remand, to correction. The remaining issues raised by Defendant-appellant regarding court costs, financial sanctions, and ineffective assistance of counsel are barred by res judicata. Judgment affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for resentencing to correct the imposition of post release control.
Judges: Tucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ColeOhio Supreme Court· 1982-12-29· cited 797×
- State v. JordanOhio Supreme Court· 2004-12-01· cited 641×
- State v. ThreattOhio Supreme Court· 2006-03-15· cited 239×
- State v. Grimes (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2017-05-24· cited 175×
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court· 2012-03-01· cited 54×
- State v. VealOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-04-19· cited 14×
- State v. MusselmanOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-04-19· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.