Court of Appeals of Arizona· 10/28/2004

State v. Kuntz

Citations

100 P.3d 26
209 Ariz. 276
2004 Ariz. App. LEXIS 158
2004 WL 2403638

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

determining whether Minnesota offense of third-degree criminal sexual conduct was equivalent to Arizona offense of sexual assault
to avoid due process violations, facts of underlying conviction should not be considered when making determination of whether offenses are equivalent
to avoid due process violations, facts of underlying conviction should not be considered when making determination of whether offenses are equivalent
“Whether the trial court properly applied § 13-3821(A) is a question of law that we review de novo.”
“statute underlying foreign conviction must be compared to Arizona statute in effect at time of offense in deciding whether offense would have been punishable as a felony if committed in Arizona”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Timmer, Hall, Kessler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.