Skip to main content

State v. Armstrong

Citations

  • 195 P.3d 731
  • 146 Idaho 372
  • 2008 Ida. App. LEXIS 105

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the Supreme Court in Jakoski specifically referenced a constitutional basis for its holding
  • holding an inaccurate code citation to the charge convicted of in the judgment of conviction was a clerical error, subject to correction on remand pursuant to Rule 36
  • “Accordingly, a party may assert a lack of subject matter jurisdiction for the first time on appeal . . . and the issue may even be raised sua sponte by a trial court or appellate court.”
  • listing cases where the term “jurisdiction” is loosely used
  • listing cases where the term “jurisdiction” is loosely used

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lansing, Gutierrez, Perry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.