Court of Appeals of Oregon· 7/25/2001
State v. Anderson
Citations
- 175 Or. App. 464
- 28 P.3d 662
- 2001 Ore. App. LEXIS 1060
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- assuming without deciding, based on state’s concession, that defendant was in compelling circumstances or custody when questioned by police
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brewer, Ceniceros, Landau
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Fare v. Michael C.Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 1,729×
- People v. BurtonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1971-12-28· cited 217×
- State v. MageeOregon Supreme Court· 1987-10-20· cited 87×
- State v. MendezOregon Supreme Court· 1989-05-16· cited 32×
- Thomas Riley v. Gayle Franzen, Director, Illinois Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court· 1981-11-16· cited 27×
- State v. FosterOregon Supreme Court· 1980-03-04· cited 27×
- State v. LarsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-05-22· cited 24×
- State v. RivasCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-10-18· cited 13×
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Thai/SchmollingCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-12-27· cited 9×
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-04-30· cited 8×
- State v. McCoyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-02-23· cited 6×
- State v. OnuskanichCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-07-22· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.