Court of Appeals of Oregon· 5/22/1996

State v. Larson

Citations

917 P.2d 519
141 Or. App. 186
1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 704

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that considerations in voluntariness analysis include whether the person giving consent is the subject of an investigation
explaining that invol- untariness requires some kind of coercion, the existence of which turns on facts such as “whether physical force was used or threatened, whether weapons were displayed, and whether the consent was obtained in public”
affirming trial court’s determination that, where officer asked the defendant, “Would you please open the door [of the van]?” the defendant’s consent was voluntary
noting a factor relevant to voluntariness includes “whether the person who gives consent is the subject of an investigation”
among factors to consider in determining 50 Stomps v. Persson the voluntariness of a consent to search is whether drug or alcohol use has impaired the defendant’s ability to make a knowing, voluntary, and intelligent choice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riggs, Landau, Leeson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.