State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Thai/Schmolling

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, if a court’s ruling admitting evidence is not challenged on appeal, we assume without deciding that such evidence was properly admitted
• assuming without deciding that Miranda warnings were required because the parties agreed that the setting was “custodial” when police questioned youth
• child’s statements, asking “why’ he had been arrested for sexual abuse and stating that the allegations “were not true and that only his brother Michael was the one that did that” did not evince a desire to engage in a generalized discussion about the substance of the investigation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).