State v. Casteneda-Perez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “calls for comment on the evidence” lacks specificity and is insufficient to preserve error for appeal
• noting that the practice of asking the defendant whether another witness had Red during his or her testimony has been “generally condemned”
• “Unquestionably, to ask a witness to express an opinion as to whether another witness is lying does invade the province of the jury.”
• improper to ask if another witness told lie or was lying

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).