Washington Supreme Court· 9/26/2013

State v. Dye

Citations

178 Wash. 2d 541
309 P.3d 1192

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

laying out the grounds by which a court abuses its discretion, including the factual findings being unsupported by the record
“the trial court is in the best position to analyze the actual necessity of a special dispensation”
a trial court has broad discretion to make a variety decisions regarding the conduct of trial
courts have power to control trial proceedings, including the use of a support animal
“we do not require a showing of ‘substantial need’ or ‘compelling necessity’ like Delaware, in Gomez, 25 A.3d at 798–99, or Hawaii, in Palabay,[]844 P.2d 1”
“we do not require a showing of ‘substantial need’ or ‘compelling necessity’ like Delaware, in Gomez, 25 A.3d at 798–99, or Hawaii, in Palabay,[]844 P.2d 1”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fairhurst, González, Johnson, Madsen, McCloud, Owens, Stephens, Wiggins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

61 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.