Missouri Court of Appeals· 9/30/1987
State v. Taylor
Citations
- 739 S.W.2d 220
- 1987 Mo. App. LEXIS 4748
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that evidence that defendant had assaulted his girlfriend was not relevant and prejudicial where defendant was charged with manufacturing and possessing marijuana
- \[the] prevailing standard is that error can be declared harmless only if we are `able to declare a belief that it was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.'\
- “[the] prevailing standard is that error can be declared harmless only if we are ‘able to declare a belief that it was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holstein, Crow, Greene
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Missouri· 2002-05-28· cited 102×
- State v. JoinerMissouri Court of Appeals· 1991-11-12· cited 28×
- State v. SandersMissouri Court of Appeals· 2003-12-02· cited 27×
- State v. JensenSupreme Court of Missouri· 2017-07-11· cited 22×
- State v. GreeneMissouri Court of Appeals· 1991-12-11· cited 19×
- State v. HitchcockMissouri Court of Appeals· 2011-01-12· cited 17×
- State v. HernandezMissouri Court of Appeals· 1991-07-26· cited 17×
- State v. HarveyMissouri Court of Appeals· 1989-03-08· cited 8×
- State v. TaylorMissouri Court of Appeals· 1993-06-17· cited 8×
- State v. PruittMissouri Court of Appeals· 1988-08-15· cited 5×
- State v. AtkinsonMissouri Court of Appeals· 1992-06-30· cited 2×
- STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. NATHAN WAYNE JENSENMissouri Court of Appeals· 2015-08-27
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.