Court of Appeals of Washington· 4/8/1974

State v. Terry

Citations

520 P.2d 1397
10 Wash. App. 874
1974 Wash. App. LEXIS 1516

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating in dicta, the excited utterance exception will not be extended where the statement \relates merely to an event which is not established except by the hearsay testimony itself\
stating in dicta, the excited utterance exception will not be extended where the statement “relates merely to an event which is not established except by the hearsay testimony itself”
testimony of pathologist, who exhibited confusion concerning the meaning of “rea sonable medical certainty” and would only testify as to the “more probable than not” cause of death, satisfied the standard
pathologist who stated he could not give an opinion on the cause of death with \reasonable medical certainty” could testify that a particular cause of death was \more probable than not”, satisfying the standard
admissibility of medical expert testimony on cause of death

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Swanson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.