Skip to main content
· 1/18/2002

United States v. William Lee Patterson

Citations

  • 277 F.3d 709
  • 57 Fed. R. Serv. 1319
  • 110 A.L.R. 5th 681
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 782
  • 2002 WL 73494

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding, pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 901(b)(4
  • “that the machine generated an inaccurate fingerprint image that happened to be identical to a fingerprint recovered by a different person using a different process in a different location — is simply implausible”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilkins, Williams, Hamilton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.