Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2/12/2014
State v. Anderson
Citations
- 407 S.C. 278
- 754 S.E.2d 905
- 2014 WL 551576
- 2014 S.C. App. LEXIS 22
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding the referenced evidence did not implicate Brady because \the exculpatory value of the unmatched prints was entirely speculative\
- noting impeachment evidence is favorable
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Few, Konduros, Only, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 8,539×
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court· 1976-06-24· cited 6,537×
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court· 1995-04-19· cited 6,003×
- State v. JenningsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-09-19· cited 122×
- State v. BlackSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2012-10-03· cited 110×
- State v. PriceSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-04-17· cited 63×
- State v. WeaverlingCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-10-25· cited 60×
- State v. McEachernCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2012-06-06· cited 26×
- Hyman v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2012-03-14· cited 16×
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-12-21· cited 14×
- State v. GoodeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1991-07-08· cited 13×
- State v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2012-02-15· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.