Court of Appeals of Oregon· 6/19/2019

State v. Ames

Citations

445 P.3d 928
298 Or. App. 227

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that a matter was preserved when the policies underlying the preserva- tion requirement were “obviously served”
observing that, when considering whether to consent to a jury waiver, “the trial court’s focus, with regard to protect- ing a defendant’s rights, should be on whether a defendant’s jury waiver is valid; that is, whether the waiver is voluntarily and knowingly made”
explain- ing that providing the trial court “the opportunity to fully consider and rule in the first instance” is among the policies served by the preservation requirement
cit- ing State v. Parkins, 346 Or 333, 340-41, 211 P3d 262 (2009)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Armstrong, Shorr, Tookey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.