Court of Appeals of Oregon· 3/11/2020
State v. Arnold
Citations
- 302 Or. App. 765
- 462 P.3d 753
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that when the policies underlying the preservation requirement are served, the argument is preserved
- holding that when the policies underlying the preservation requirement are served, the argument is preserved
- “A court’s authority to forgo the usual due process requirements and summarily punish contemptuous conduct that occurs in the courtroom must therefore be based on the court’s personal knowledge of the conduct.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Shorr
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In Re OliverSupreme Court· 1948-03-08· cited 2,065×
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court· 2009-04-30· cited 1,741×
- State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court· 2003-10-02· cited 666×
- State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court· 2000-12-01· cited 659×
- Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court· 1997-06-26· cited 448×
- Peeples v. LampertOregon Supreme Court· 2008-08-14· cited 389×
- Johnson v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1971-06-14· cited 208×
- State v. ParkinsOregon Supreme Court· 2009-06-25· cited 123×
- State v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-04-04· cited 29×
- State v. MurgaCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-04-25· cited 23×
- State v. SpainhowerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-07-05· cited 19×
- State v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-07-07· cited 14×
- City of Salem v. SalisburyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-05-31· cited 13×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-10-17· cited 13×
- City of Klamath Falls v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1979-11-26· cited 10×
- State v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-02-23· cited 7×
- State v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-03-14· cited 6×
- State v. AmesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-06-19· cited 5×
- Barton v. MaxwellOregon Supreme Court· 1997-03-20· cited 5×
- State v. BlackburnCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-02-23· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.