Oregon Supreme Court· 4/1/1999

State v. Baker

Citations

976 P.2d 1132
328 Or. 355
1999 Ore. LEXIS 127

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that the Voters’ Pamphlet recommends that the trial court consider the preferences of the prosecutor in making its discretionary decision
holding as unconstitutional a statute that granted to the prosecutor a right to jury trial because the statute infringed on criminal defendants' right to waive a jury under Article I, section 11
“Granting the state the right to demand a jury trial, when the defendant desires otherwise and the trial judge accepts the defendant’s choice, is inconsistent with Article I, section 11.”
“Granting the state the right to demand a jury trial, when the defendant desires otherwise and the trial judge accepts the defendant’s choice, is inconsistent with Article I, section 11.”
interpreting right to waive jury trial under Article I, section 11
interpreting right to waive jury trial under Article I, section 11

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gillette

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.