State v. Spreitz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that ineffective assistance of counsel claims are to be brought in Rule 32 proceedings
• holding that any ineffective assistance of counsel claims must be brought in Rule 32 post-conviction proceedings
• holding that ineffective assistance of counsel claims must be raised in Rule 32 proceedings, not in a direct appeal
• holding that “ineffective assistance of counsel claims are to be brought in Rule 32 proceedings”
• holding that ineffective assistance of counsel claims will not be considered on direct appeal and, instead, must be presented in Rule 32 proceedings
• holding that ineffective assistance of counsel claims will not be considered on direct appeal and, instead, must be presented in Rule 32 proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).