Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Court of Appeals of Oregon· 3/11/1992

State v. Allen

Citations

  • 826 P.2d 127
  • 112 Or. App. 70
  • 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 486

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendant consented to the search of his suitcase because he did not withdraw his consent, even when it became apparent the officer was going to open the suitcase
  • holding that the defendant consented to the search of his suitcase because he did not withdraw his consent, even when it became apparent the officer was going to open the suitcase
  • concluding that the scope of defendant’s consent extended to a suitcase in the trunk of the car where defendant gave consent in response to the officer’s request to search defendant’s car for “weapons, narcotics or large sums of money”
  • during a search of defendant’s car for drugs, weapons, or large sums of money, the officer asked defendant which of the suitcases in the trunk belonged to him, making it “apparent that [the officer] was going to open the suitcase”
  • officer did not exceed scope of consent, in part, because he specifically asked if he could search car for drugs or large amounts of cash and the defendant agreed
  • both holding that, where officers told individuals stopped for traffic offenses that they were “free to go” and then immediately requested consent to search, the request for consent was a “separate exchange” from the stop

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richardson, Joseph, Deits

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.