Skip to main content

State v. Jacobsen

Citations

  • 922 P.2d 677
  • 142 Or. App. 341
  • 1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 1106

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that when an owner of an automobile consents to the general sweep of his vehicle, he nonetheless retains a privacy interest in the contents of a zipped duffel bag inside the vehicle
  • holding that when an owner of an automobile consents to the general sweep of his vehicle, he nonetheless retains a privacy interest in the contents of a zipped duffel bag inside the vehicle
  • stating that, absent a constitutional basis to justify a search of a zipped duffel bag in a car, evidence inside the duffel bag must be suppressed
  • inquiring what a reasonable person would have understood the scope of consent to be, based, in part, on the contents of the defendant’s consent
  • court will not address issue raised for the first time on appeal if parties were not allowed to develop the factual record at trial
  • court will not address issue raised for the first time on appeal if parties were not allowed to develop the factual record at trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Deits, De Muniz Haselton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.