State v. Harvey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting exchange was not a casual conversation before concluding that reasonable person would have understood that officer had an investigative purpose and intended to look in closed containers in car
• distinguishing the officer’s request to “search” defendant’s car from the casual request in Jacobsen
• emphasizing that our holding in Jacobsen was fact-specific

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Blair
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2017-06-15· cited 23×
• State v. Fugate
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-12-20· cited 12×
• State v. De La Rosa
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-05-27· cited 11×
• State v. BAKER/JAY
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-11-18· cited 7×
• State v. Delong
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-12-09· cited 5×
• State v. Lamoreux
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-06-17· cited 4×
• State v. Blair
  Tillamook County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2016-05-25· cited 3×
• State v. Winn
  Marion County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2016-05-25· cited 2×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Weaver
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1994-06-23· cited 67×
• State v. Allen
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-03-11· cited 30×
• State v. Charlesworth
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-10-22· cited 28×
• State v. Jacobsen
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-07-31· cited 17×
• State v. Luther
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1983-05-11· cited 13×
• State v. Luther
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1983-11-15· cited 12×
• State v. Helow
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-12-06· cited 10×