Skip to main content

State v. Bailey

Citations

  • 924 P.2d 833
  • 143 Or. App. 285
  • 1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 1331

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reaching the same conclusion where the state raised search incident to arrest for the first time on appeal and the court’s factual findings were ambivalent on a critical issue
  • declining to apply judicial estoppel against the state in a criminal proceeding because this court will “reverse or modify trial court rulings only if those rulings are erroneous as asserted by the party assigning or cross-assigning error”
  • stop did not end, for Dominguez-Martinez purposes, when officer told defendant that he was “free to go” because officer continued to retain defendant’s handgun
  • stop did not end, for Dominguez-Martinez purposes, when officer told defendant that he was \free to go\ because officer continued to retain defendant's handgun

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Deits, De Muniz Haselton, Haselton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.