Supreme Court of Minnesota· 5/31/2013
State v. Hayes
Citations
- 831 N.W.2d 546
- 2013 WL 2364067
- 2013 Minn. LEXIS 307
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- providing that error is plain if it “contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct”
- stating that jury is not required to unanimously agree on which specific acts of domestic abuse constitute a past pattern of domestic abuse
- including in circumstances proved medical testimony that child victim's \cranial trauma was more severe than could be explained by a mere accidental household fall\
- describing second step of analysis: independent examination of inferences drawn from circumstances proved and whether those circumstances are consistent with guilt and inconsistent with any rational hypothesis negating guilt
- affirming conviction arising from infant’s severe head injury, despite defendant’s expert’s testimony of possible accidental cause, because circumstantial evidence showed that injuries “were too severe to be the result of a typical household fall”
- reviewing unobjected-to jury instructions for plain error
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Anderson, Barry, Been, Consideration, Paul, Stras, Submission, Took, Wright
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State of Minnesota v. Amanda Lea PeltierSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2016-02-10· cited 39×
- State of Minnesota v. David Muniz BustosSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2015-04-01· cited 30×
- State v. Ayala-LeyvaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2014-05-19· cited 12×
- State v. PedersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2013-12-09· cited 11×
- State v. WentheCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2014-04-07· cited 9×
- State of Minnesota v. Alie Christine Theodore DornCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2016-02-16· cited 3×
- State v. ZinskiSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2019-05-15· cited 3×
- State v. WeyausCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2013-09-03
- State of Minnesota v. Melvin BilbroSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2025-08-20
- State of Minnesota v. Jeremy Jermaine ChamberlainCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2024-05-20
- State of Minnesota v. Adam Taylor FravelSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2026-04-29
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1935-04-15· cited 4,581×
- Schad v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1991-09-13· cited 1,454×
- State v. GrillerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-07-30· cited 451×
- United States v. Oscar Rosa, Vincent Lopez, Ricardo Rodriguez, Hector Hernandez, and Armando VelasquezSecond Circuit· 1993-12-03· cited 366×
- State v. RameySupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-09-14· cited 347×
- State v. SaldanaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-08-31· cited 204×
- State v. SilvernailSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2013-05-31· cited 194×
- State v. AndersenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2010-06-30· cited 190×
- State v. Al-NaseerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2010-09-16· cited 181×
- State v. LeakeSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-06-23· cited 100×
- State v. BairdSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-12-05· cited 89×
- State v. HelterbridleSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-10-31· cited 88×
- State v. CrowsbreastSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2001-07-12· cited 79×
- State v. GrecingerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-09-18· cited 74×
- People v. WashingtonNew York Court of Appeals· 1995-06-14· cited 71×
- Hilligoss v. Cargill, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-08-01· cited 69×
- State v. HollidaySupreme Court of Minnesota· 2008-03-06· cited 66×
- State v. HokansonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2012-10-03· cited 65×
- State v. McArthurSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-04-12· cited 59×
- State v. BeecroftSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2012-05-23· cited 58×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.