Supreme Court of Minnesota· 10/29/1998
State v. Lee
Citations
- 585 N.W.2d 378
- 1998 Minn. LEXIS 754
- 1998 WL 751181
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “‘probable cause to search [exists] where the known facts and circumstances are sufficient to warrant a man of reasonable prudence in the belief that the contraband or evidence of a crime will be found’ ”
- incorporating the time of day into the probable cause determination and recognizing that drinking is often involved later at night
- incorporating the time of day into the probable cause determination and recognizing that drinking is often involved later at night
- factoring the time of day into the probable-cause determination and recognizing that drinking often occurs later at night
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Blatz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. BrittonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2000-01-13· cited 90×
- State v. ShrinerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2008-05-30· cited 85×
- State v. BradfordSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2000-10-25· cited 78×
- State v. BurbachSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-12-01· cited 68×
- State v. BrockmanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-02-22· cited 66×
- State v. RochefortSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2001-07-19· cited 52×
- State v. LemieuxSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-01-18· cited 40×
- State v. LopezSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2010-02-11· cited 35×
- State v. ZornesSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2013-05-31· cited 30×
- State, Lake Minnetonka Conservation District v. HornerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2000-10-12· cited 29×
- Chafoulias v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-09-17· cited 27×
- State of Minnesota v. Derek Lawrence StavishSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2015-08-19· cited 27×
- State v. HeaneySupreme Court of Minnesota· 2004-12-02· cited 25×
- Mell v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2008-11-25· cited 24×
- Groe v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2000-06-27· cited 17×
- City of Golden Valley v. WiebesickSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2017-07-19· cited 16×
- State of Minnesota v. Jimmy Dawayne LesterSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2016-02-10· cited 15×
- State v. KrenikCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2009-10-27· cited 8×
- State v. ShrinerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2007-10-02· cited 5×
- McGlothlin v. SteinmetzSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2008-06-19· cited 5×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-06-10· cited 7,197×
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1949-10-10· cited 6,013×
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court· 1981-01-21· cited 5,975×
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court· 1989-04-03· cited 4,647×
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1963-06-10· cited 3,146×
- Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1978-06-26· cited 1,598×
- State v. StorvickSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1988-08-05· cited 49×
- State v. KlawitterSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1994-06-30· cited 47×
- State v. WiernaszSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-08-27· cited 43×
- State v. SpeakSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-11-04· cited 34×
- Tyler v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-05-24· cited 34×
- State v. AguirreSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-07-03· cited 32×
- State v. ShoenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-05-07· cited 29×
- State v. LudtkeSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-06-02· cited 28×
- State v. SouthernSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-03-20· cited 5×
- State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1998-06-17· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.