New Mexico Court of Appeals· 4/26/1993
State v. Affsprung
Citations
- 854 P.2d 873
- 115 N.M. 546
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that a border patrol agent, within the scope of a permissible checkpoint inquiry, may ask questions of the driver and passenger about citizenship and ask them to explain suspicious circumstances
- stating that moving the defendant to the secondary area was \an appropriate detention\ because the agent had reasonable suspicion
- stating that moving the defendant to the secondary area was “an appropriate detention” because the agent had reasonable suspicion
- “While it is true that reasonable suspicion does not provide carte blanche, it does allow detention sufficient to verify or dispel the circumstances giving rise to the suspicion.”
- “While it is true that reasonable suspicion does not provide carte blanche, it does allow detention sufficient to verify or dispel the circumstances giving rise to the suspicion.”
- stating the constitutionally acceptable boundaries for fixed checkpoints stops
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Black, Alarid, Chavez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. Cardenas-AlvarezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2001-04-30· cited 114×
- State v. WernerNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1994-03-08· cited 111×
- State v. WaltersNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1996-12-30· cited 83×
- State v. TYWAYNE H.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1997-01-29· cited 44×
- State v. Porras-FuerteNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1994-12-16· cited 29×
- State v. GuzmanNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1994-06-30· cited 17×
- State v. HicksNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2013-02-18· cited 11×
- State v. Cardenas-AlvarezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2000-01-31· cited 9×
- State v. HicksNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2013-04-03· cited 1×
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court· 1981-01-21· cited 5,975×
- United States v. SharpeSupreme Court· 1985-03-20· cited 2,970×
- United States v. Martinez-FuerteSupreme Court· 1976-07-06· cited 2,153×
- United States v. Montoya De HernandezSupreme Court· 1985-07-01· cited 982×
- United States v. JohnsSupreme Court· 1985-01-21· cited 515×
- United States v. Ramon Rubio-RiveraTenth Circuit· 1990-10-26· cited 105×
- State v. BoeglinNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1983-06-23· cited 94×
- Joseph v. HelmsSupreme Court· 1982-06-14· cited 90×
- Holloway v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1986-06-02· cited 81×
- State v. CopelandNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1986-08-19· cited 68×
- City of Las Cruces v. BetancourtNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1987-03-05· cited 64×
- United States v. William Glenn Prichard and Brian De PalmaTenth Circuit· 1981-05-11· cited 58×
- State v. CohenNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1985-12-09· cited 55×
- United States v. Michael Ray Haley William Harry RiehlFourth Circuit· 1982-01-21· cited 54×
- State v. JonesNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1992-06-10· cited 54×
- State v. BoltonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1990-09-20· cited 53×
- State v. GossNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1991-01-03· cited 53×
- United States v. Larry Earl SandersTenth Circuit· 1991-06-24· cited 42×
- United States v. Jose Manuel BenitezTenth Circuit· 1990-03-30· cited 41×
- State v. LyonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1985-08-01· cited 36×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.