United States v. Larry Earl Sanders

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “directing Defendant to the secondary inspection area to answer additional questions is permissible under the Fourth Amendment”
• holding that \directing Defendant to the secondary inspection area to answer additional questions is permissible under the Fourth Amendment\
• stating that movement to a secondary area is “permissible under the Fourth Amendment”
• stating that movement to a secondary area is \permissible under the Fourth Amendment\
• “To claim suspicious circumstances based solely on the time of day an individual chooses to travel risks labeling all who travel on what some feel is an unusual hour as suspicious.”
• \To claim suspicious circumstances based solely on the time of day an individual chooses to travel risks labeling all who travel on what some feel is an unusual hour as suspicious.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).