United States v. Ramon Rubio-Rivera

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that defendant had standing to challenge search of car he was in where the only evidence regarding ownership indicated that the car belonged to the defendant’s brother and that defendant had permission to use the car and where the State presented no evidence to the contrary
• “A defendant may not challenge an allegedly unlawful search or seizure unless he demonstrates that his own constitutional rights have been violated.”
• “A defendant may not challenge an allegedly unlawful search or seizure unless he demonstrates that his own constitutional rights have been violated.”
• immigration agent authorized to conduct an NCIC check as part of his normal inquiry at border checkpoint
• “Where the defendant offers sufficient evidence indicating that he has permission of the owner to use the vehicle, the defendant plainly has a reasonable expectation of privacy in the vehicle and standing to challenge [its] search.”
• controverted facts under standing issue reviewed under clearly wrong standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).