Ohio Court of Appeals· 1/19/2024
State v. Adams
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 174
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in overruling appellant's motion to suppress. The law enforcement officers had reasonable, articulable suspicion that appellant was under the influence and, as he got out of his vehicle, an officer observed drugs in plain view inside the vehicle. At that point, the officers had probable cause to search the vehicle. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Huffman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-06-10· cited 7,197×
- United States v. RossSupreme Court· 1982-06-01· cited 3,985×
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court· 1977-12-05· cited 3,269×
- Cady v. DombrowskiSupreme Court· 1973-06-21· cited 2,465×
- Maryland v. WilsonSupreme Court· 1997-02-19· cited 1,555×
- State v. AndrewsOhio Supreme Court· 1991-01-23· cited 948×
- State v. MooreOhio Supreme Court· 2000-09-20· cited 370×
- State v. FergusonOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-08-21· cited 100×
- State v. DunnOhio Supreme Court· 2012-03-15· cited 87×
- State v. MillertonOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-01-09· cited 27×
- State v. SantiagoOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-10-14· cited 25×
- State v. WeisgarberOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-12-01· cited 14×
- State v. HunterOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-12-09· cited 12×
- State v. McCarthyOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-12-29· cited 5×
- State v. ThorntonOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-04-28· cited 4×
- State v. SarnoOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-11-15· cited 3×
- State v. BoydOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-01-17· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.