State v. McCarthy
Citations
- 203 N.E.3d 912
- 2022 Ohio 4738
Syllabus
The trial court did not err by overruling appellant's motion to suppress drug evidence that was found inside his vehicle without a warrant. The drug evidence was discovered in plain view while police officers were lawfully engaged in a community caretaking/emergency-aid function. There was also no seizure of appellant's person due to appellant's unconsciousness when the police officers approached and opened his vehicle. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Welbaum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court· 1980-06-30· cited 6,313×
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court· 1991-06-20· cited 4,435×
- Cady v. DombrowskiSupreme Court· 1973-06-21· cited 2,465×
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court· 2003-10-22· cited 2,261×
- State v. Adams (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2015-10-01· cited 375×
- State v. Leak (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-01-20· cited 135×
- State v. DunnOhio Supreme Court· 2012-03-15· cited 87×
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals· 2010-06-22· cited 65×
- State v. BelcherOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-09-30· cited 13×
- State v. StarcherOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-12-09· cited 7×
- State v. HlinovskyOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-12-01· cited 6×
- State v. Glowney & GlowneyOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-08-23· cited 5×
- State v. WindleOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-09-15· cited 4×
- State v. HallOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-02-07· cited 2×
- Columbus v. RidleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-09-30· cited 1×
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-01-21· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.