State v. Weisgarber

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to compel policy disagreement with the methamphetamine Guideline just because other judges have done so
• refusing to compel No. 19-5534 8 United States v. Dustin Johnson policy disagreement with the methamphetamine Guideline just because other judges have done so
• declining to compel the district court to vary from the methamphetamine Guidelines simply because other judges within the district had done so based on policy disagreement
• affirming refusal to “vary downward” based on a -3- between actual methamphetamine and a mixture containing methamphetamine when fashioning an appropriate sentence. Cf. Heim, 941 F.3d at 340. But they are “not required to do so.” Id. (citations omitted
• “[W]hile a district court may choose to deviate from the guidelines because of a policy disagreement, it is not required to do so.” (cleaned up)
• “We have consistently held that, ‘while a district court may choose to deviate from -4- the [G]uidelines because of a policy disagreement,’ it is ‘not required to do so.’” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).