Court of Appeals of Washington· 4/12/2011

State v. Abuan

Citations

161 Wash. App. 135

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that specific criminal intent may be inferred \from conduct that plainly indicates such intent as a matter of logical probability\
Criminal intent may be inferred “from conduct that plainly indicates such intent as a matter of logical probability.”
To show actual prejudice, the appellant must establish “from an adequate record that the trial court likely would have granted a suppression motion.”
insufficient 17 In re Pers. Restraint of Arntsen No. 101635-2 evidence of fear in fact when the defendant shot outside a house and victim was inside and could not see any shooting
insufficient 17 In re Pers. Restraint of Arntsen No. 101635-2 evidence of fear in fact when the defendant shot outside a house and victim was inside and could not see any shooting
an act done with intent to create in another apprehension and fear of bodily injury, which in fact creates a reasonable apprehension and imminent fear of bodily injury, is a common law definition of assault recognized in Washington

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Armstrong, Deren, Hunt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

54 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.