State v. Fenwick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the purpose of objecting is to ensure that the trial court had the opportunity to correct any errors and avoid unnecessary appeals
• where defendant failed to request a suppression hearing, the State did not have opportunity to fully develop the record and show how the warrantless search was lawful

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Chimel v. California
  Supreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 6,512×
• Arizona v. Gant
  Supreme Court· 2009-04-21· cited 2,725×
• State v. McFarland
  Washington Supreme Court· 1995-09-13· cited 2,396×
• State v. Kirkman
  Washington Supreme Court· 2007-04-05· cited 747×
• State v. O'Hara
  Washington Supreme Court· 2009-10-01· cited 697×
• Thornton v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2004-05-24· cited 660×
• State v. Thomas
  Washington Supreme Court· 1987-10-08· cited 629×
• State v. Scott
  Washington Supreme Court· 1988-06-09· cited 576×
• State v. Johnson
  Washington Supreme Court· 1996-01-18· cited 221×
• State v. Mierz
  Washington Supreme Court· 1995-08-24· cited 161×
• State v. Robinson
  Washington Supreme Court· 2011-04-14· cited 145×
• State v. Valdez
  Washington Supreme Court· 2009-12-24· cited 139×
• State v. Afana
  Washington Supreme Court· 2010-07-01· cited 126×
• State v. Patton
  Washington Supreme Court· 2009-10-22· cited 111×
• State v. Powell
  Washington Supreme Court· 2009-04-30· cited 108×
• State v. Kirwin
  Washington Supreme Court· 2009-03-26· cited 71×
• State v. Kirkpatrick
  Washington Supreme Court· 2007-07-12· cited 70×
• State v. Harris
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2010-01-07· cited 57×
• State v. Abuan
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2011-04-12· cited 52×