Skip to main content

State Ex Rel. Curry v. Bowman

Citations

  • 885 S.W.2d 421
  • 1993 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 195
  • 1993 WL 500500

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court can fashion remedies other than provided in article 35.261
  • holding trial court committed no error when it reinstated veniremembers struck on basis of race instead of calling new array
  • noting that defendant “did not expressly assert any statutory rights” and concluding that trial court did not abuse its discretion in reinstating improperly challenged juror
  • noting that defendant “did not expressly assert any statutory rights” and concluding that trial court did not abuse its discretion in reinstating improperly challenged juror
  • noting that Batson Court left selection of appropriate remedy to discretion of state and federal courts and concluding that when defendant “did not expressly assert any statutory rights” trial court did not abuse its discretion in reinstating improperly challenged venire member
  • noting that Batson Court left selection of appropriate remedy to discretion of state and federal courts and concluding that when defendant “did not expressly assert any statutory rights” trial court did not abuse its discretion in reinstating improperly challenged -venire member

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Overstreet, Maloney, White, Meyers, McCormick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.