Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 12/8/1993
State Ex Rel. Curry v. Bowman
Citations
- 885 S.W.2d 421
- 1993 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 195
- 1993 WL 500500
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the trial court can fashion remedies other than provided in article 35.261
- holding trial court committed no error when it reinstated veniremembers struck on basis of race instead of calling new array
- noting that defendant “did not expressly assert any statutory rights” and concluding that trial court did not abuse its discretion in reinstating improperly challenged juror
- noting that defendant “did not expressly assert any statutory rights” and concluding that trial court did not abuse its discretion in reinstating improperly challenged juror
- noting that Batson Court left selection of appropriate remedy to discretion of state and federal courts and concluding that when defendant “did not expressly assert any statutory rights” trial court did not abuse its discretion in reinstating improperly challenged venire member
- noting that Batson Court left selection of appropriate remedy to discretion of state and federal courts and concluding that when defendant “did not expressly assert any statutory rights” trial court did not abuse its discretion in reinstating improperly challenged -venire member
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Overstreet, Maloney, White, Meyers, McCormick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Butler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-03-09· cited 263×
- Casarez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1995-12-13· cited 112×
- Batiste v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-09-14· cited 106×
- Yarborough v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-06-11· cited 90×
- Price v. ShortTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1996-08-30· cited 68×
- State v. FranklinSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1995-03-13· cited 67×
- State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2012-03-13· cited 59×
- Boones v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2005-06-06· cited 47×
- Peetz v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2005-11-10· cited 37×
- Tomlin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2002-11-22· cited 27×
- Dorsey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2002-03-01· cited 23×
- Ezell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1995-12-08· cited 22×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-10-10· cited 19×
- Garza v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2000-01-06· cited 18×
- Moss v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 1994-06-15· cited 18×
- Epps v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-09-26· cited 14×
- Broadnax v. LumpkinFifth Circuit· 2021-02-08· cited 14×
- Roberts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-10-21· cited 12×
- Coleman v. HoganSupreme Court of Virginia· 1997-06-06· cited 11×
- Craig v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2002-04-11· cited 10×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- Powers v. OhioSupreme Court· 1991-04-01· cited 2,917×
- Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.Supreme Court· 1991-06-03· cited 1,403×
- Georgia v. McCollumSupreme Court· 1992-06-18· cited 1,235×
- Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-01-08· cited 229×
- Stearnes v. ClintonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-09-27· cited 184×
- State v. OliverCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-05-01· cited 61×
- State Ex Rel. Thomas v. BannerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-02-11· cited 37×
- Jacobs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-01-22· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.