Skip to main content

Ezell v. State

Citations

  • 909 P.2d 68
  • 66 O.B.A.J. 3913
  • 1995 OK CR 71
  • 1995 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 78
  • 1995 WL 728196

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \We adopt this flexible approach as the best solution. We interpret Batson as suggesting that either remedy may be appropriate depending on the particular circumstances at trial\
  • \This Court also refuses to countenance relief for invited error.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chapel, Johnson, Lumpkin, Lane, Strubhar

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.