New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2/13/2002
State v. Martinez
Citations
- 42 P.3d 851
- 131 N.M. 746
- 2002 NMCA 036
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that with better organization of her voir dire, counsel could have asked the questions claimed to be precluded within the trial court’s time limits
- noting that with better organization of her voir dire , counsel could have asked the questions claimed to be precluded within the trial court's time limits
- observing that courts may also consider whether a cognizable group has been eliminated from the jury altogether, was substantially underrepresented, or the case itself was sensitive to bias
- considering, among other factors, whether cognizable group was underrepresented on the jury or the case was particularly sensitive to bias as evidence of discriminatory intent
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pickard, Wechsler, Castillo
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2010-03-23· cited 105×
- State v. SalasNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2010-06-15· cited 48×
- York v. El-GanzouriAppellate Court of Illinois· 2004-09-30· cited 36×
- State v. StoreyNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2017-09-28· cited 33×
- State v. Gerald B.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2006-01-05· cited 22×
- State v. DoradoNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2019-05-31· cited 1×
- State v. BlantonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2022-10-17· cited 1×
- Watson v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2014-10-02
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 38,518×
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court· 1981-03-04· cited 15,585×
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court· 1993-06-25· cited 8,844×
- Powers v. OhioSupreme Court· 1991-04-01· cited 2,917×
- Hazen Paper Co. v. BigginsSupreme Court· 1993-04-20· cited 1,653×
- United States v. Anthony Esparsen, United States of America v. Kelly Esparsen, United States of America v. Robert McFaddenTenth Circuit· 1991-04-18· cited 161×
- Heno v. Sprint/United Management Co.Tenth Circuit· 2000-04-03· cited 143×
- Harrell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama· 1990-11-30· cited 113×
- State v. SosaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1997-07-18· cited 102×
- Ex Parte ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama· 1994-09-02· cited 99×
- Stanley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-07-01· cited 98×
- United States v. JohnsonTenth Circuit· 1993-09-09· cited 92×
- State v. JimNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1988-10-18· cited 74×
- State v. SosaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2000-11-15· cited 72×
- State v. DominguezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1993-03-19· cited 64×
- Linscomb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-03-11· cited 63×
- State v. ClarkNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1999-07-08· cited 62×
- State v. GonzalesNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1991-01-10· cited 56×
- State v. PadillaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1997-03-17· cited 44×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.