California Supreme Court· 5/3/2004

People v. Johnson

Citations

71 P.3d 270
1 Cal. Rptr. 3d 1
30 Cal. 4th 1302

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that the court maintains its “longstanding practice” of refusing to engage in comparative juror analysis for the first time on appeal
noting that the court maintains its “longstanding practice” of refusing to engage in comparative juror analysis for the first time on appeal
noting that the court maintains its “longstanding practice” of refusing to engage in comparative juror analysis for the first time on appeal
“We reiterate what we ... stated in Box: ... ‘strong likelihood’ and ‘reasonable inference’ state the same standard.”
“[W]e do not believe that comparative juror analysis for the first time on appeal is constitutionally compelled.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chin, Werdegar, Kennard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

57 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

76 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.