· 1/27/2012
Stacy King v. Larry Norris
Citations
- 666 F.3d 1132
- 2012 WL 246516
- 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 1509
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the AEDPA limitation period began running the day after the deadline for filing a petition for review with the Arkansas Supreme Court
- noting Gonzalez “instructed us that when a petitioner decides to forgo state- court appeals, we must ‘look to state-court filing deadlines’ to determine the ‘expiration of the time for seeking [direct] review.’”
- applying Rule 6(a)(1)(A) to AEDPA statutes of limitations and excluding from the time computation the day of the event that triggers the time days elapsed before Petitioner filed his pro se motion for post-conviction relief on April 25, 2016 (Doc. 7-19 at 9-28
- habeas statute of limitations began running the day after the deadline for filing a petition for review with the Arkansas Supreme Court
- habeas statute of limitations began running the day after the deadline for filing a petition for review with the Arkansas Supreme Court
- habeas statute of limitations began running the day after the deadline for filing a petition for review with the Arkansas Supreme Court
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wollman, Melloy, Colloton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.