Mark Christeson v. Don Roper

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• attorney negligence in calculating a deadline is neither abandonment nor extraordinary circumstances justifying reopening a judgment under Rule 60(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Holland v. Florida
  Supreme Court· 2010-06-14· cited 3,974×
• Gonzalez v. Crosby
  Supreme Court· 2005-06-23· cited 3,107×
• Lawrence v. Florida
  Supreme Court· 2007-02-20· cited 1,693×
• Maples v. Thomas
  Supreme Court· 2012-01-18· cited 724×
• Paul Kreutzer v. Michael S. Bowersox, Warden, Superintendent
  Eighth Circuit· 2000-11-15· cited 208×
• James Harold Peterson Paula Peterson v. City of Plymouth Michael Ridgley David Lindman Mark Bevins
  Eighth Circuit· 1995-07-14· cited 123×
• United States v. Kenneth Ray Martin
  Eighth Circuit· 2005-05-27· cited 113×
• State v. Christeson
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2001-06-26· cited 77×
• Kevin Mark Abela v. William Martin, Director, Michigan Department of Corrections
  Sixth Circuit· 2003-10-22· cited 75×
• Stacy King v. Larry Norris
  Eighth Circuit· 2012-01-27· cited 68×
• Rick Lee Snow v. John Ault
  Eighth Circuit· 2001-01-09· cited 49×
• Christeson v. Roper
  Supreme Court· 2015-01-20· cited 44×
• Ernest Cadet v. State of Florida Department of Corrections
  Eleventh Circuit· 2014-01-31· cited 41×
• Christeson v. State
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2004-04-13· cited 23×
• Tuwane English v. United States
  Eighth Circuit· 2016-08-24· cited 21×
• In Re Carlyle
  Eighth Circuit· 2011-07-11· cited 14×

Other cases named Mark Christeson v. Don Roper

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Mark Christeson v. Don Roper
  Eighth Circuit· 2017-01-18