Skip to main content

St. Yves v. Mid State Bank

Citations

  • 757 P.2d 1384
  • 111 Wash. 2d 374
  • 3 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1187
  • 1988 Wash. LEXIS 164

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that parol evidence not admissible to create an ambiguity
  • holding that parol evidence not admissible to create an ambiguity
  • trial court dismissed action under CR (12)(b)(6), not excluding affidavits; on review this court treated it as a summary judgment
  • trial court dismissed action under CR (12)(b)(6), not excluding affidavits; on review this court treated it as a summary judgment
  • written contract for at-will employment unambiguous; lower appellate court erred in determining that personnel policy manual raised issue of fact as to whether manual created independent basis for wrongful discharge claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Utter, Dore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named St. Yves v. Mid State Bank

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.