Emrich v. Connell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[p]arol or extrinsic evidence is not admissible to add to, subtract from, vary, or contradict written instruments which are contractual in nature and which are valid, complete, unambiguous, and not affected by accident, fraud, or mistake”
• fully integrated agreement is one that the parties intended to be a final expression of all terms agreed upon
• whether a writing is intended to be a fully integrated agreement is a question of fact, and in making that determination, the trial court may consider relevant extrinsic evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).