Washington Supreme Court· 5/1/1986
Brady v. Daily World
Citations
- 718 P.2d 785
- 105 Wash. 2d 770
- 1 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 891
- 1986 Wash. LEXIS 1120
- 57 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 397
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining to decide whether alcoholism was a disability under the WLAD
- question of fact whether employer had sufficient evidence to support dismissal due to intoxication
- “Whether any of these policies amounted to promises of specific treatment in specific situations, and if so, whether plaintiff justifiably relied upon any of these promises are questions of fact which remain to be proven.”
- declining to decide whether alcoholism was a disability under the WLAD
- replacement must be outside the protected age group
- replacement must be outside the protected age group
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brachtenbach, Dolliver, Utter, Dore, Pearson, Andersen, Callow, Goodloe, Durham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Grimwood v. University of Puget Sound, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 1988-04-14· cited 319×
- Daniel Kimbro, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Atlantic Richfield Company, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantNinth Circuit· 1989-11-14· cited 169×
- Allison v. Housing Authority of City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court· 1991-12-12· cited 162×
- Baldwin v. Sisters of Providence in Washington, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 1989-03-30· cited 160×
- Collings v. Longview Fibre Co.Ninth Circuit· 1995-08-14· cited 150×
- Phillips v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court· 1989-01-19· cited 136×
- Swanson v. Liquid Air CorporationWashington Supreme Court· 1992-03-05· cited 114×
- Kirby v. City of TacomaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-10-05· cited 86×
- Kirby v. City of TacomaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-09-14· cited 84×
- Stewart v. Chevron Chemical Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1988-10-27· cited 71×
- Carle v. McChord Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1992-04-15· cited 65×
- Bulaich v. AT&T INFORMATION SYSTEMSWashington Supreme Court· 1989-09-14· cited 46×
- Clipse v. Commercial Driver Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2015-08-25· cited 37×
- St. Yves v. Mid State BankWashington Supreme Court· 1988-07-15· cited 34×
- Hatfield v. Columbia Federal Savings BankCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1990-05-17· cited 26×
- Griffith v. Schnitzer Steel IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-07-19· cited 24×
- Griffith v. Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2005-07-19· cited 24×
- Stork v. International Bazaar, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1989-05-30· cited 23×
- Hill v. J.C. Penney, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1993-06-07· cited 23×
- Plumbers & Steamfitters Union Local 598 v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1986-08-14· cited 18×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court· 1982-12-29· cited 937×
- Thompson v. St. Regis Paper CompanyWashington Supreme Court· 1984-07-05· cited 536×
- Roberts v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1977-08-18· cited 172×
- Parker v. United Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1982-08-04· cited 35×
- Rose v. Hanna Mining CompanyWashington Supreme Court· 1980-09-18· cited 21×
Other cases named Brady v. Daily World
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.