Skip to main content
· 9/4/1980

Klinke v. Famous Recipe Fried Chicken, Inc.

Citations

  • 616 P.2d 644
  • 94 Wash. 2d 255
  • 1980 Wash. LEXIS 1358

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • summary judgment is not appropriate when reasonable minds might reach different conclusions
  • “Equitable estoppel is based upon a representation of existing or past facts, while promissory estoppel requires the existence of a promise.”
  • summary judgment is not appropriate when reasonable minds might reach different conclusions
  • a party may not defend on the statute of frauds if that party has breached his oral promise to reduce a contract to writing when the other party relied on the promise to his detriment
  • “A party who promises, implicitly or explicitly, to make a memorandum of a contract ... and then breaks that promise, is estopped to interpose the statute ... [against one] who relied [on the promise] to his detriment.”
  • summary judgment is not appropriate when reasonable minds might reach different conclusions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Utter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.